La demande d'image HD porte sur l'image en cours de consultation. Vous recevrez dans votre boîte e-mail (adresse {MAIL_USER}) un message contenant un lien de téléchargement de l'image souhaitée.
Nous vous rappelons que si l'usage privé de ces images est permis, toute reproduction ou représentation du contenu de cette base dans le cadre de communication, d'édition ou autres actions à caractère professionnel doit faire l'objet d'une autorisation expresse des auteurs ou ayant droits des œuvres. Si vous êtes dans ce cas, merci de nous contacter.
https://altair.imarabe.org//notice.php?q=id:72229book2017La 4e de couverture indique : "Women Judges in the Muslim World: A Comparative Study of Discourse and Practice fills a gap in academic scholarship by examining public debates and judicial practices surrounding the performance of women as judges in eight Muslim-majority countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Morocco). Gender, class, and ethnic biases are inscribed in laws, particularly in the domain of shariʿa-derived family law. Editors Nadia Sonneveld and Monika Lindbekk have carefully woven together the extensive fieldwork and expertise of each author. The result is a rich tapestry that brings out the various effects of women judges in the management of justice. In contrast to early scholarship, they convincingly prove that ‘the woman judge’ does not exist."1 vol. (XXII-324 p.) : ; 25 cm. ; ill. ;Femmes jugesPays islamiquesLindbekk, ToreSonneveld, NadiaWomen and gender: the Middle East and the islamic worldABES
La 4e de couverture indique : "Women Judges in the Muslim World: A Comparative Study of Discourse and Practice fills a gap in academic scholarship by examining public debates and judicial practices surrounding the performance of women as judges in eight Muslim-majority countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Morocco). Gender, class, and ethnic biases are inscribed in laws, particularly in the domain of shariʿa-derived family law. Editors Nadia Sonneveld and Monika Lindbekk have carefully woven together the extensive fieldwork and expertise of each author. The result is a rich tapestry that brings out the various effects of women judges in the management of justice. In contrast to early scholarship, they convincingly prove that ‘the woman judge’ does not exist."
